Compare Canon EF 70-300 IS USM vs EF-S 55-250 IS STM
several years, I used the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM teleprompter, with
the Canon 6D and Canon 1100d apparatuses, and was quite happy, despite
its inherent disadvantage-soap on long foci. I
was happy with the color rendering, fast focus, and especially the
stabilizer, which allowed me to shoot with my hands literally in the
dark with exposures from 1/20. The happiness lasted for almost three years, until I had it pulled out of my bag at a flea market in Palermo. There
was no enthusiasm to buy a new one for 35T, there was nothing suitable
on Ebay either, but there was an EF-S 55-250mm f / 4-5. 6 IS STM, brand
new, at a price of only 180 us rubles. The
fact that this lens was only for kropa, I was not confused, since I
used the stolen TV box in 95% of cases on the kropnutom Appart. Surprisingly,
the image quality of this "cheap plastic craft for beggars" turned out
to be no worse than that of the stolen one, excellent sharpness on a
fully open diaphragm, accurate focusing, optical stabilization also
allowed you to use long exposures. Especially pleased with the weight and compactness-the kit fit well in a small bag. The main drawback that I noticed was strong vignetting, but it was easily cured programmatically right in the machine. Everything was fine when I was shooting static in good light, until I got to the festival of the Three kings in Spain. Here the lens was completely helpless due to slow focus. In addition, the inability to use it on a full-frame Canon 6D with its high ISO was very depressing. There was a thought to carefully file the tail of the bayonet, but then you would have to limit the range of focus. So
I decided to get a proven EF 70-300mm again, spent several weeks
monitoring Ebay, and finally found a suitable option for $ 180. The package from Japan came for 7 (seven!) finally, there was a perfectly packaged and well-preserved lens inside. When
testing proved that it is even better stolen (was somene that I slipped
slightly defective, so a full check at the store gave me). In my joy, I threw 55-250 and went on the next trip with a new purchase. However, analyzing the results, I found that in many cases the image from the "plastic toy" is noticeably better. To make sure of this, I conducted a small test with the Canon 1100D device.
1. Long focus, maximum aperture
EF-S55-250 (250mm, f / 5.6, 1 / 15c, ISO 2000).
EF 70-300 (235мм, f/5.6, 1/15, ISO1000). As you can see, the quality of the second image is significantly worse, despite the fact that the ISO is twice as low. However, the latter indicates an unimportant luminosity of kropa.
first pair of images were taken from a distance of one and a half
meters, which is the minimum for focusing EF70-300, so we will make
another couple of frames from a distance of about 3.5 meters:
EF-S 55-250 (237mm, f/5.6, 1/15c, ISO 4000).
EF 70-300 (235мм, f/5.6, 1/15, ISO 2000). The result is the same.
2. Short focus, open aperture:
EF-S 55-250 (70mm, f / 4.5, 1/125, ISO100).
EF 70-300 (70mm, f/5.6, 1/125, ISO160). As you can easily see, the sharpness is about the same in the focus area. Crop's depth of field is greater, and the difference in light angle is no longer so significant.
3. Short focus, " universal aperture":
EF-S 55-250 (70mm, f / 8, 1/125, ISO200).
EF 70-300mm (70мм, f/8, 1/125, ISO320). The center is the same again, but the edges of the 300th are noticeably worse. Again, kropa's grip is wider. And (suddenly!) the latter's luminosity is noticeably higher.
4. Длинный фокус, открытая диафрагма:
EF-S 55-250 (250мм, f/5.6, 1/125, ISO160).
EF 70-300 (240мм, f/5.6, 1/125, ISO125). Здесь трудно заметить отличия в качестве, у обоих объективов оно равномерно по всему полю кадра. Со светосилой тоже примерно одинаково.
5. Long focus, " universal aperture":
EF-S 55-250 (250мм, f/8, 1/125, ISO320).
EF 70-300 (240mm, f / 8, 1/125, ISO250). The three-hundredth is slightly better in the center, but noticeably inferior at the edges. It should be noted that this will affect the full frame even more.
From the above, we can draw the following conclusions: a cheap plastic lens is no worse than 70-300 in terms of image quality. Ergonomics is significantly better. The lens is very good for shooting architectural and landscape details, even in low light. However, it is completely unsuitable for reporting for the reason mentioned above - slow focus. You can, of course, do 70-300, but still on the next trip I will take both lenses. Especially since the EF-S 55-250 mm f/4-5.6 IS STM weighs only 375 grams.